Attest vs. assert
They assert. AEQUARA attests.
Most AI tells you it’s good. AEQUARA shows you — every material claim is calibrated and hash-locked, tamper-evident and recomputable in your own browser. Here’s the difference, dimension by dimension.
Common questions
Isn’t “attestation” just a fancier word for marketing?
No. Marketing is a claim you’re asked to believe. An attestation is a claim you can re-derive: the content is hash-locked and written to an append-only ledger, and you can recompute the hash yourself in your browser. If the words and the hash disagree, the attestation fails. That’s the opposite of marketing.
Why don’t you just name your competitors?
Because we won’t assert things about other companies that we can’t verify — that would be the exact failure mode we’re built to avoid. We contrast the two approaches honestly: assertion (vouch for yourself) versus attestation (the claim is hash-locked and recomputable by anyone). The pattern is the point, not any one rival.
If you sign your own claims, how is that independent?
Independence here comes from recomputability, not from who holds the pen. Today the signature is our own (HMAC-SHA256) — it makes the record tamper-evident, and anyone can re-derive the hash in their browser and check it against the public ledger, so you never have to take our word for it. A fully independent third-party anchor is in progress; until it lands we say exactly that, rather than overclaim a neutral signer.
How do I see this for myself?
Open the proof page, pick any clip, and re-derive its SHA-256 in your browser; or take the free Calibration Scorecard and watch your own calibration gap and Brier score get computed from your answers. Both are verifiable, not asserted.
See it for yourself — re-derive a claim, or measure your own calibration.
Verify a claim →Take the Scorecard →Glossary →